>
Global Finance
>
Cross-Border Investing: Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Cross-Border Investing: Legal and Regulatory Considerations

12/29/2025
Marcos Vinicius
Cross-Border Investing: Legal and Regulatory Considerations

Cross-border investing presents vast opportunities for growth and diversification in today's globalized economy.

However, navigating this landscape requires a keen understanding of evolving legal and regulatory hurdles that can impact your investments.

Recent U.S. policies, such as the Outbound Investment Security Program, have introduced new challenges that demand attention.

These frameworks are designed to protect national security interests while shaping international financial flows.

For investors and businesses, staying informed is not just a choice but a necessity for success.

This article delves into the key aspects of these regulations, offering practical insights to guide your decisions.

By embracing compliance and strategic planning, you can turn potential obstacles into avenues for innovation.

The U.S. Outbound Investment Framework: An Overview

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Outbound Investment Security Program was finalized in October 2024.

It became effective on January 2, 2025, targeting investments in sensitive technologies within certain regions.

This program prohibits or requires notification for U.S. persons' investments in entities involved in critical sectors.

Key sectors include semiconductors, quantum information technologies, and artificial intelligence.

The definition of "U.S. persons" is broad, encompassing citizens, residents, and U.S.-organized entities.

This expansion ensures that the regulations have a wide-reaching impact on global investment activities.

Understanding these definitions is the first step toward ensuring compliance and avoiding penalties.

Key Developments: The COINS Act of 2025

The COINS Act, enacted in December 2025, marks a significant evolution in U.S. outbound investment policy.

It codifies and expands the OISP into a statutory framework with bipartisan support.

This act authorizes funding and extends the program's term, reflecting years of policy consideration.

One of its major changes is the expansion of covered countries beyond China.

This shift underscores the growing focus on global security threats in investment regulations.

For investors, this means adapting to a broader scope of restrictions and requirements.

Staying ahead of these changes can help mitigate risks and seize new opportunities.

Countries of Concern: A Geographic Expansion

The COINS Act broadens the list of countries subject to investment controls, moving beyond the OISP's China focus.

This expansion includes nations like Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela.

Understanding which regions are affected is crucial for planning cross-border transactions.

The table below summarizes the coverage under both frameworks:

This geographic shift highlights the need for comprehensive due diligence in international deals.

Investors must reassess their portfolios to ensure alignment with these updated lists.

Covered Technologies and Sectors

The COINS Act anchors regulations in specific technologies, expanding from the OISP's three core sectors.

These sectors are considered critical for national security and economic competitiveness.

  • Semiconductors and microelectronics
  • Quantum information technologies
  • Artificial intelligence (AI)
  • High-performance computing and supercomputing
  • Hypersonic systems

Each of these areas represents cutting-edge advancements that drive modern innovation.

Treasury will define parameters for prohibited versus notifiable technologies through regulations.

This distinction is vital for determining compliance obligations and risk levels.

Proactive monitoring of these definitions can help businesses avoid unintended violations.

Defining Covered Transactions and Entities

Covered transactions under the COINS Act include a wide range of investment activities.

These are broadly defined to capture various forms of financial engagement.

  • Equity investments, such as stakes in entities
  • Convertible debt instruments
  • Greenfield investments for new facilities
  • Joint ventures with foreign partners
  • Limited partner interests in certain funds

U.S. persons cannot knowingly direct non-U.S. entities to engage in prohibited transactions.

This adds a layer of responsibility for global business operations and oversight.

Covered foreign persons are entities or individuals with nexus to countries of concern.

They are engaged in covered technologies, with criteria based on location and control.

The COINS Act introduces changes, such as focusing on ownership-based jurisdiction.

This shift simplifies some aspects but requires careful assessment of entity structures.

Prohibitions vs. Notifications: Understanding the Differences

The regulations distinguish between prohibited and notifiable transactions based on technology type.

Prohibited transactions involve technologies deemed an acute national security threat and are outright banned.

Notifiable transactions require U.S. persons to notify Treasury if knowingly engaged.

This system aims to balance security concerns with transparency in investment flows.

For investors, identifying which category applies is essential for compliance planning.

Failure to adhere can result in significant penalties and reputational damage.

Early engagement with legal advisors can clarify these distinctions and reduce risks.

Exceptions to the Rules

The COINS Act expands the list of exceptions from the OISP, providing relief in certain scenarios.

These exceptions help mitigate the burden on legitimate business activities.

  • Purchases of publicly traded securities on registered exchanges
  • Limited partner investments in pooled vehicles with assurances
  • Intracompany transfers supporting non-covered operations
  • Full buy-outs of covered foreign persons' interests
  • Certain secondary transactions and contractual arrangements
  • Payment processing and underwriting services
  • Authorized intelligence activities

Non-U.S. investors can implement recusal mechanisms to comply with these rules.

Understanding these exceptions allows for strategic investment structuring and flexibility.

They offer pathways to engage in cross-border deals while adhering to regulatory frameworks.

Compliance Mechanisms and Enforcement Tools

The COINS Act introduces new tools to enhance compliance and enforcement efforts.

These mechanisms are designed to provide clarity and support for stakeholders.

  • A public database of covered foreign persons, with a petition process
  • Confidential guidance requests for transaction coverage assessments
  • Evidence submission channels for public and congressional input
  • Discretionary sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act

These tools reflect a collaborative approach to national security priorities and regulation.

For businesses, leveraging these resources can streamline due diligence and decision-making.

Staying informed about database updates and guidance releases is crucial for ongoing compliance.

Practical Impacts for Businesses: Due Diligence and Risks

The evolving regulatory landscape sharply increases due diligence expectations for global firms.

Investors must reassess compliance resources and internal protocols to manage risks.

Non-U.S. firms face indirect control risks, such as through funds with U.S. limited partners.

This necessitates adaptations in investment structures and operational planning.

Supply chain and trade pressures, including tariff expansions, further complicate cross-border activities.

Timeline monitoring is critical, especially with Treasury rulemaking set for 2026 and beyond.

Early diligence can help navigate unpredictable licensing and approval processes.

Proactive risk management turns these challenges into opportunities for resilience and growth.

Looking Ahead: Strategic Implications and Broader Context

The rapid changes in U.S. outbound investment policy reflect a broader shift toward security-focused regulation.

Bipartisan support for the COINS Act indicates sustained commitment to these frameworks.

Global businesses must integrate these considerations into long-term planning and risk management.

Non-U.S. implications are minimal without a U.S. nexus, but fund structures may need adaptation.

Embracing innovation and compliance synergies can drive competitive advantage in this environment.

By staying agile and informed, investors can navigate cross-border investing with confidence and success.

The future promises continued evolution, making ongoing education and adaptation key to thriving in global markets.

Marcos Vinicius

About the Author: Marcos Vinicius

Marcos Vinicius